HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ms Liann
F&F Feedback Appreciated
This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.
In ROE V WADE, the judges had their staffs research abortion laws
going back 4,000 years around the world. They could not find any basis
in history for strong public interest in abortion over most of that
time. They claimed an unsubstantiated "public interest" in the fetus
which increases over time, from extremely low public interest in early
pregnancy to very high public interest in late pregnancy. However, this
so-called "public interest" is fictional without a strong public
RESPONSIBILITY of financial support for the life that the public finds
so interesting. The Supreme Court was unable to prove even one example
where any society in history took upon itself to provide child support
and healthcare to late term fetuses or their born results insisted by
"public interest".
If the public truly had any interest they would begin by making
financial preparations for the new citizen which they insist has a right
to be born because of their "interest".
Absent any financial support, it is perfect correct to treat the Supreme
Court with Supreme Disrespect for lying about the subject. Students had
a right to be bussed to schools to defeat segregation, so the SCOTUS
has imposed public spending for public interest in the past. Without any
financial support GUARANTEES for a full 18 years, there is no reason to
believe liars in black robes that there is any public interest in the
matter.
In ROE V WADE, the judges had their staffs research abortion laws going back 4,000 years around the world. They could not find any basis in history for strong public interest in abortion over most of that time. They claimed an unsubstantiated "public interest" in the fetus which increases over time, from extremely low public interest in early pregnancy to very high public interest in late pregnancy. However, this so-called "public interest" is fictional without a strong public RESPONSIBILITY of financial support for the life that the public finds so interesting. The Supreme Court was unable to prove even one example where any society in history took upon itself to provide child support and healthcare to late term fetuses or their born results insisted by "public interest".
If the public truly had any interest they would begin by making financial preparations for the new citizen which they insist has a right to be born because of their "interest".
Absent any financial support, it is perfect correct to treat the Supreme Court with Supreme Disrespect for lying about the subject. Students had a right to be bussed to schools to defeat segregation, so the SCOTUS has imposed public spending for public interest in the past. Without any financial support GUARANTEES for a full 18 years, there is no reason to believe liars in black robes that there is any public interest in the matter.