Saturday, October 27, 2012

Todd Akin Ad Slams Claire McCaskill's 'Arrogance' (VIDEO)


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/27/todd-akin-ad-claire-mccaskill_n_2031126.html?utm_hp_ref=politics


photo
Ms Liann
F&F Feedback Appreciated
1 second ago ( 6:30 PM)
This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.

Talking about ARROGANCE...

How about Akin, a guy who can't understand God's Laws Of Physics that are involved in Global Warming Science, and can't understand God's Laws of Biology that are involved in Evolution Science, thinking he's so smart he understands the mind and intent of God. After all, God is an abortionist himself since the beginning of time causing still-birth and spontaneous abortion galore without pausing to wallow in guilt.

Talking about ARROGANCE...

Ho3w about Todd Akin's supreme ARROGANCE claiming that an common street punk rapist can make god his errand boy, delivering souls to victims whenever Beelzebub's henchman gets an urge in his loins.

What Richard Mourdock's Rape Comments Mean for Jews


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ann-lewis/richard-mourdock-rape-abortion_b_2025442.html?utm_hp_ref=elections-2012


photo
Ms Liann
F&F Feedback Appreciated
1 second ago ( 3:58 PM)
This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.

Roe V Wade is NOT ABOUT ABORTION.

Roe V Wade is about the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY.

The govt doesn't have the power to regulate abortion because the Constitution never gave it to the govt.

The SOVEREIGN PEOPLE, who own the govt, reserved a zone of PRIVACY around themselves, which govt is forbidden to trespass without well outline criteria of great public interest.

Underwear covers the PRIVATES. They are PRIVATE PARTS.

Govt has no interest there.

Citizen rights only go to BORN persons, either NATURALLY BORN CITIZENS, or NATURALIZED BORN CITIZENS. Fetus is not born, not a citizen, not your business.

Life doesn't begin at "conception" -- it began 3.5 BILLION YEARS AGO on this planet. Not every sperm deserves to get a name.

God is the biggest abortionist of them all, producing stillborns and spontaneous abortions since time began, no big deal to god. And when he is not producing stillborns, he's got a lot of deformed birth defects that dies soon after birth to answer for.


Richard Mourdock One Of At Least A Dozen GOP Senate Candidates Who Oppose Abortion For Rape Victims [UPDATE]

Commented Oct 27, 2012 at 15:25:59 in Politics

“You have 2000 years of christian murders. Saul of Tarsus was a serial murderer himself, running around prosecuting "heretics" and killing them, as his followers did for 20 centuries. Even now there are still death squads in the Americas murdering "sinful people".

When Ferdinand & Isabel waved goodby to Columbus sailing on his first voyage they turned around and established the SPANISH INQUISITIONS which continued torture-murder until 1776. That killing went on for centuries.

The Puritans escaped the beheadings and burning at the stake in Europe to set up Massachusetts, Roger Williams escaped the repression of the witch-burners to set up Rhode Island, William Penn escaped the beheadings and burnings at the stake to establish Pennsylvania.

The founders did not find religious warfare old history -- it was CURRENT EVENTS.

They set up a country where no christian sect could overthrow the country passing one law after another in their favor.

They talked openly and publicly about the ABSOLUTE WALL OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. The state Rhode Island, established as a refuge from religious tyranny, required the BILL OF RIGHTS or it would not ratify the Constitution at all.

he 1st amendment separates me and you from religious laws, and the 2nd amendment puts a price tag on violating the first.

I am not THREATENING anything. Busting the 1st amendment destroys freedom of religion completely, and the price if you do that is suicide says the 2nd amendment.”

What Richard Mourdock's Rape Comments Mean for Jews



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ann-lewis/richard-mourdock-rape-abortion_b_2025442.html?utm_hp_ref=elections-2012


photo
Ms Liann
F&F Feedback Appreciated
1 second ago ( 2:52 PM)
This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.

Totally WRONG Argument. It is not "should we allow one sect to overthrow Freedom of Religion for all other sects, by writing the laws. That is NOT THE ISSUE.

The issue is allowing any sect to OVERTHROW the right of PRIVACY.

First the wasn't any govt other than temporary govt intended to be discarded and replaced after the revolution. Then there were the SOVERIGN PEOPLE deciding to create a govt tabla rosa, blank slate.

The govt had no powers because it didn't exist yet. The people decided to give it powers EXPLICITLY, and also give it powers implied "absolutely necessary" only to exercise the powers enumerated. It it wasn't ENUMERATED POWER, or implied required to exercise the ENUMERATED POWER, then the govt didn't get that power. It never existed in the govt. THE SOVEREIGN CITIZENS have that power, NOT the govt.

There are no "secret laws". The SOVEREIGN PEOPLE reserved a sphere of privacy around themselves. This is EXPLICIT in the limit on govt to torture a person into confessions, EXPLICIT in warrants required to search houses and papers. PRIVACY is EXPLICITLY RESERVED TO THE SOVEREIGN OWNERS OF GOVT.

If my papers are private, how much more is what's going on in my underpants PRIVATE. The English word for the contents of underpants is "PRIVATES" or "PRIVATE PARTS".

If you never received bestowal of the power to rule people's underpants, then you don't have that power in the govt now. That power does not exist and has never existed.