This is a record of censorship of left viewpoints expressed as comments on HuffingtonPost.com as responses to articles and other readers views. I may not get my speech freely there, but you can see what they have deleted by coming over here how much censoring that Huffington Post does. Some articles may look liberal over there but the "moderators" are not moderates -- they are hard right radicals who censor out people who disagree with them, skewing the comments and falsifying the public dialog.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Mitch McConnell: Filibuster Fight Is An Unnecessary 'Bomb' In The Senate
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/mitch-mcconnell-filibuster_n_2200494.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
1 second ago (11:55 PM)This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.
The AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED PROTECTING, not the Senate minority.
The racist confederacy Senators have blocked a black president from doing what they allowed white presidents to do: get his appointees confirmed, get his treaties ratified, get his agenda passed. There are THOUSANDS of judgeships vacant in the Federal Court system because the white dixies won't let a black man choose judges. There are treaties affecting nuclear arms reductions sitting without a vote because the Johnny Rebs are waving their confederate flags in the black man's face, There's infrastructure repair and jobs bills not being passed because the pointy heads are burning crosses instead of voting.
Rick Santorum 2016? Former GOP Presidential Candidate Says He's 'Open' To Another Run
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/rick-santorum-2016-president_n_2199386.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
1 second ago ( 4:41 PM)This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.
Remember, you have to have Rick Santorum and Frothy in the same comment to win. And you have to tweet your comment for extra credits.
1 second ago ( 4:48 PM)This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.
Have to make it a discipline to pound him weekly. Set up a GOOGLE ALERT for Rick-Santorum.
The hyphen in Rick-Santorum tells google that both terms are required, not just one or the other.
Write your comments defending CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY, and such to letters to the editor or comments sections. Don't be surprised when righty websites censor you and finally block you. Just waves after waves of people need to keep on coming and wearing him out for four years. This guy could have done the extra 1.6% split off of votes from Obama that would have won in 2012. Mitt was Obama's candidate of choice, or as Santorum said "THE WORST POSSIBLE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE".
You can't wait for 2016 to start hammering these guys. Then it's an uphill battle against a billion dollars of free FOX in-kind illegal media donations undeclared on their IRS tax returns.
GOP Senators: Susan Rice Meeting Left Us 'More Disturbed' Than Before [UPDATE]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/gop-senators-susan-rice_n_2198255.html
1 second ago ( 3:11 PM)This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.
I AM AN AMERICAN PEOPLE.
I WAS NOT MISLEAD BY SUSAN RICE.
ALL MY QUESTIONS ON BENGHAZI HAVE BEEN ANSWERED.
I do no trust Hanoi John McCain, treasonous swishypants Linsey Graham, and TOKYO ROSE Ayotte.
I do not authorize the Al Qaeda helpers to further promote a small skirmish in a wider war to elevate hitmen assassins as ARAB WORLD CELEBRITIES. I demand the GOP curb the traitor talk from those giving AID & COMFORT TO THE ENEMY.
I demand President Obama hold these three Senators at GITMO until an investigation into the damages to US prestige is completed, awaiting charges.
1 second ago ( 3:14 PM)This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.
I demand that Harry Reid, or whoever is selected to be Senate Majority Leader, ABOLISH THE HOLD. Three Senators have threatened to use the "HOLD" to veto the democratic principle of MAJORITY RULES, as in the electorate voted a MAJORITY TO RULE, not a minority to HOLD absolute veto power. LOSING HAS CONSEQUENCES -- that's why you want to woo the voters with message and policy they will VOTE FOR. FAILURE to woo voters does not grant any veto power to the LOSERS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
In ROE V WADE, the judges had their staffs research abortion laws going back 4,000 years around the world. They could not find any basis in history for strong public interest in abortion over most of that time. They claimed an unsubstantiated "public interest" in the fetus which increases over time, from extremely low public interest in early pregnancy to very high public interest in late pregnancy. However, this so-called "public interest" is fictional without a strong public RESPONSIBILITY of financial support for the life that the public finds so interesting. The Supreme Court was unable to prove even one example where any society in history took upon itself to provide child support and healthcare to late term fetuses or their born results insisted by "public interest".
If the public truly had any interest they would begin by making financial preparations for the new citizen which they insist has a right to be born because of their "interest".
Absent any financial support, it is perfect correct to treat the Supreme Court with Supreme Disrespect for lying about the subject. Students had a right to be bussed to schools to defeat segregation, so the SCOTUS has imposed public spending for public interest in the past. Without any financial support GUARANTEES for a full 18 years, there is no reason to believe liars in black robes that there is any public interest in the matter.