Thursday, August 8, 2013

Pennsylvania Rep. Steve Bloom Seeks Cosponsors For Bill That Spurs Creationism Discussion

Pennsylvania Rep. Steve Bloom Seeks Cosponsors For Bill That Spurs Creationism Discussion


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/07/steve-bloom-creationism_n_3720530.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

It is time Rebecca Klein learned how to use GOOGLE is she wants to stay employed as Associate Education Editor.

A simple search on GOOGLE for ::: Steve Bloom "Intelligent Design" produced enough hits to convince even the HARD OF UNDERSTANDING the proof that Steve Bloom has no interest in Judeo-Christian "Creationism" but instead is championing Unification Church "Intelligent Design".
Maybe an "Education Editor" doesn't know the difference, in which case the editor ought to get EDUCATED. "Intelligent Design" is NOT "creationism". ID has only a surface similarity with creationism. ID is a trojan horse which has a long-range goal of entrapping gullible and under-educated people into a totalitarian belief system created in North Korea which mixes Asian Ancestor-Worship with biblical doctrines to sucker bible believers that a Korean Man is the Messiah who replaced Jesus after god fired Jesus for failure.

Intelligent Design is Anti-Jewish and Anti-Christian both and it has no relationship to traditional "creationist" beliefs which have historically existed in America.

Good journalism requires writers to know the difference and to point out to the readers the differences. A govt lawmaker supporting indoctrination in a totalitarian anti-freedom-of-religion system like the foreign-based Unification Church (which "unifies" ancestor worship with judeo-christian ideas) would not be re-elected if his constituents were ever told what Intelligent Design is created to do.

https://twitter.com/LiannTheLiann/status/365399966627270656


Unification Church (Moonies) "Intelligent Design" Trojan Horse

Unification Church (Moonies) "Intelligent Design" Trojan Horse

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design
Intelligent design (ID) is a form of creationism promulgated by the Discovery Institute, a politically conservative think tank based in the United States.[1] The Institute defines it as the proposition that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection."[2] It is a contemporary adaptation of the traditional teleological argument for the existence of God, presented by its advocates as "an evidence-based scientific theory about life's origins" rather than "a religious-based idea".[3] All the leading proponents of intelligent design are associated with the Discovery Institute [n 1][4] and believe the designer to be the Christian deity.[n 2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design_movement

It has happened recently that Huffington Post has published several articles about RED STATES adopting "creationist" science curricula in public schools. The articles are written with no particular attention to the vast chasm between "christians" and the North- Korean-Ancestor-Worship Unification Church religion that has a superficial christian veneer and has supplanted "Jesus" with "Sun Myung Moon" as messiah.  Unification "theology: is a trojan horse with an anti-christian core.

 photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party



25 minutes ago ( 4:11 AM) 
To add to my point, evolution WAS taught at the private Catholic school I attended. When they taught it, it was explained that evolution was not the "official" position of what Catholics believe, but that it is held as a majority consensus in science as being the most scientifically valid theory for the creation of the universe. We were also taught the earth was over 4 billion years old.

As a result, I ended up (in my youth) believing that God created the earth but that the earth is 4 billion + years old (old earth creationism). Interestingly enough, I still believe the same today, though I'm christian and not specifically "catholic".

I just provided my story in hopes to add some context to this policy debate/issue. I think the main questions are:

#1. Can it simply be taught that because evolution is a theory and not law, its plausible that alternative hypothesis could be offered up....without directly mentioning creationism?
#2. Would allowing an alternative view, even if it doesn't directly relate to religion, be a violation of seperation of church and state (considering science is not a god/religion)?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ms Liann
F&F Feedback Appreciated



1 second ago ( 5:25 AM)
This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.

You flunked science. Evolution is not a "theory" -- it is OBSERVABLE FACT. We create new lifeforms in the labs today using the SCIENCE that works reliably over and over and over. We create new species, not just new hybrids.

The article is poorly written. "Creationism" is not at issue. The Unification Church THEOLOGY of "Intelligent Design" is associated with Steve Bloom's name as is easily ascertained by a simple Google search. There is a vast difference between "creationism" and :Intelligent Design", they are only similar in appearance but ID is a trojan horse to undermine traditional Christianity and in fact overthrow the freedom of religion in America -- there is NO FREEDOM OF RELIGION ALLOWED IN UNIFICATION CHURCH DOCTRINE.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Ozvoxhumana/steve-bloom-creationism_n_3720530_275398577.html
 Ozvoxhumana
Commented 9 hours ago in Politics


“The term "Intelligent Design" was coined by Americans. It is primarily associated with the Discovery Institute which openly declares it has a pro-Christian agenda.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design#Origin_of_the_term” 

Wikipedia says whatever anonymous volunteers write, and propagandists for causes use it to blur the truth all the time. Rather than STOPPING at reading the first entry in google results, read on and follow the ::: Intelligent-Design AND Discovery-Institute :::

Go further and google ::: Discovery-Institute AND Unification Church.

Go further and google ::: Discovery-Institute AND Hudson-Institute

Go further and google ::: Discovery-Institute AND Sun Myung Moon

Go further and google ::: Sun Myung Moon AND MESSIAH

Go further and google ::: Sun Myung Moon AND gay people are dung-eating dogs

Unification Church is ANTI-CHRISTIAN, the opposite of christian. It preaches that Jesus is a loser who was killed before he could do the job god sent him to do and therefore god had to send a better one after god fired Jesus for failure.

When the Unification Church Discovery Institute says "Christian" they use the word in the original sense of "Messiah, whomever that may be, perhaps Moon".

https://twitter.com/LiannTheLiann/status/365553950075785216 





|
You wrote: Wikipedia says whatever anonymous volunteers write, and propagandists for causes use it to blur the truth all the time. Rather than STOPPING at reading the first entry in google results, read on and follow the ::: Intelligent-Design AND Discovery-Institute :::

Go further and google ::: Discovery-Institute AND Unification Church.

Go further and google ::: Discovery-Institute AND Hudson-Institute

Go further and google ::: Discovery-Institute AND Sun Myung Moon

Go further and google ::: Sun Myung Moon AND MESSIAH

Go further and google ::: Sun Myung Moon AND gay people are dung-eating dogs

Unification Church is ANTI-CHRISTIAN, the opposite of christian. It preaches that Jesus is a loser who was killed before he could do the job god sent him to do and therefore god had to send a better one after god fired Jesus for failure.

When the Unification Church Discovery Institute says "Christian" they use the word in the original sense of "Messiah, whomever that may be, perhaps Moon".

https://twitter.com/LiannTheLiann/status/365553950075785216
#Pennsylvania Rep. #SteveBloom #Creationism http://huffpo-censor.blogspot.com/2013/08/pennsylvania-rep-steve-bloom-seeks.html?spref=tw … #DiscoveryInstitute #IntelligentDesign #SunMyungMoon #Messiah #Moonies
12:23 PM - 8 Aug 13
2 minutes ago Ozvoxhumana
The Wikipedia page gives citations for every claim it makes.
You are ranting and making wild accusations.
Think I'll go with them. Bye. 
1 second ago Ms Liann
Anybody can make a claim and anybody else can cite that claim.

The DISCOVERY INSTITUTE CLAIMS TO HAVE INVENTED INTELLIGENT DESIGN FOR UNIFICATION CHURCH PURPOSES.

Are you calling the promoters of Intelligent-Design LIARS?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Wells_%28intelligent_design_advocate%29

"Father's [Sun Myung Moon's] words, my studies, and my prayers convinced me that I should devote my life to destroying Darwinism, just as many of my fellow Unificationists had already devoted their lives to destroying Marxism.
When Father chose me (along with about a dozen other seminary
graduates) to enter a Ph.D. program in 1978, I welcomed the opportunity
to prepare myself for battle." --Jonathan Wells, Darwinism: Why I Went for a Second Ph.D. [3]

https://twitter.com/LiannTheLiann/status/365603643036151811