Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Roe v. Wade Ruling Flawed
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/11/ruth-bader-ginsburg-roe-v-wade_n_3261187.html
2 minutes ago (11:12 PM)
She is right about Roe v. Wade, although I do not agree with her
about only overturing Texas law. They should have just left it alone.
If all states are gaining momentum so would have Texas, eventually.
But, the Court at the time, made a huge mistake by overturning every
state law. States have the power to write and change laws. Roe v. Wade
has never been generally accepted by everybody and was the wrong
decision, hense the backlash today. It's possible that stare decisis
might not be applied here if a case compelling enough got to the Court.
My opinion only.
2 seconds ago (11:25 PM)This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.BS. Nothing in the constitution gives one "person" any rights to parasite and drain off the life fluids of another "person" without permission -- there goes the personhood gambit.
Nothing in the Constitution gives govt the power to invade the body of any citizen and force parenthood.
Nothing in the Constitution gives your religious beliefs about souls imparted by a busybody god compulsion over anybody who rejects such superstitions.
Nothing in the Constitution gives govt or society ownership over citizens and rights to compel them to be breeders at the whims and fashions of society.
Privacy of papers is guaranteed, privacy of home is guaranteed, privacy of personal knowledge is guaranteed -- how much more are the private parts guaranteed privacy -- they are, after all, private parts.
In America there are no "secret laws" -- all laws are written and known. There is no start point where state power over "private parts" was ever granted, and that private matter is reserved to the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS unless it was explicitly granted in writing to govt, which it never was.
