Rick Perry Decries 'Mob Rule' After Wendy Davis Filibuster
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/07/rick-perry-filibuster_n_3557557.html
1 minute ago (12:33 AM)I am still not sure who would object that at 20 weeks, it's a baby, not a choice
1 second ago (12:44 AM)This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.
There are NO BABIES IN WOMBS. A Baby breathes without an umbilical cord. A FETUS REQUIRES AN UMBILICAL CORD.
The Supreme Court has said until the fetus can forego the umbilical cord and survive outside the womb, it is NOT YOUR BUSINESS.
It is an act of FRAUD to misuse the loaded psychologically potent word BABY when you clearly mean a fetus. You are illegally attempting to steal from another person a right which is their PRIVATE PROPERTY by misusing language. FRAUD IS ILLEGAL IN ALL 50 STATES.
Jesus CONDEMNED people who spread falsehoods: John 8:44.
It is not a moral person who commits FRAUD.
Furthermore, Jehovah is the SUPREME ABORTIONIST BEING, terminating pregnancies in wombs with stillbirths and spontaneous abortions since time began. You can't even appeal to your deity for support of your ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL position.
https://twitter.com/LiannTheLiann/status/354100585584271360
Liann TheLiann
1 second ago Ms Liannhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0410_0113_ZO.html
Physician and their scientific colleagues have regarded that event with
less interest and have tended to focus either upon conception, upon
live birth, or upon the interim point at which the fetus becomes
"viable," that is, potentially able to live outside the mother's womb,
albeit with artificial aid. [n59] Viability is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks. [n60]
... With respect to the State's important and legitimate interest in
potential life, the "compelling" point is at viability. This is so
because the fetus then presumably has the capability of meaningful life
outside the mother's womb. ...
(c) For the stage subsequent to viability, the State in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life [p165]
may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where
it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation
of the life or health of the mother.
